Files
ai-job-search/tests
OluwaJomilojuandClaude Sonnet 5 7f709eda57 fix(salary): require corroboration before accepting a header row (#415)
* fix(salary): require corroboration before accepting a header row

Header-row detection accepted the first row (of the first 10) where any
cell merely contained a company-pattern word - no check that the row
actually looked like a header. A source-citation row above the real
header table (standard in real Danish union/statistics exports, e.g.
"Kilde: ... opdelt efter arbejdsgiver ...") tripped it purely because
"arbejdsgiver" appeared in prose. The real header row then parsed as
data (its "Firma" cell became a bogus company), and every genuine
company silently lost all its salary data - exit 0, no warning.

A candidate row is now only accepted when a second cell also matches a
city/count/index pattern, and a sheet that ends up with zero detected
salary columns prints a warning instead of reporting success silently.

Fixes #414.

* fix(salary): require cross-cell corroboration, fall back for untyped columns

Two edge cases found in review of the corroboration fix:

- Same-cell corroboration wasn't enough: a citation sentence can pack a
  count-pattern word into the same sentence as the company-pattern one
  ("...opdelt efter arbejdsgiver, antal svar 1234"), which still passed
  the gate. Corroboration must now come from a different cell.

- The corroboration requirement itself broke sheets whose only real
  header has purely untyped salary columns (e.g. "Base pay 2025" /
  "Bonus 2025" - neither matches a known city/count/index pattern), so
  header detection found nothing at all. Falls back to the original
  any-cell-mentions-company rule when the strict pass finds no row in
  the first 10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 08:19:08 +02:00
..