mirror of
https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search.git
synced 2026-09-17 08:36:25 +00:00
Mads LorentzenandClaude Opus 4.7
906ac1bc19
Audit of master vs the branch found three real coverage gaps in the reviewer prompt and drafter's revise step. This commit restores them without giving up the Part A (JSON edits) + Part B (narrative) structure. 1. Action-oriented reframing is restored as a Part B narrative category. The previous refactor folded reframing into Part A edit rationales, but structural weakness (e.g. "the whole opening paragraph is passive") does not fit a clean find-and-replace and needs prose critique to surface. 2. Tone and style phrasing is strengthened from "anything that conflicts with 03-writing-style.md" back to the master's proactive "check against... flag issues with tone, formality, or voice", with explicit examples (cliches, hedging, over-humility, inconsistent register). 3. Step 4 revise guidance is expanded from "Apply Part A... Apply Part B using judgment" (which could be read as a free-for-all) to an enumerated sub-list under Part B covering every category the reviewer returns: missed keywords, company angles, action-oriented reframing, tone/style. Keeps the architectural change (Part A/B split) but restores the master's explicit "apply every kind of fix" discipline. Also adds a small instruction to the reviewer: produce each Part B category even if the finding is "no issues" - silence on a category can be mistaken for skipping it. One remaining judgment call left unchanged in this commit: the reviewer no longer reads 02-behavioral-profile.md. The refactor excluded it on the reasoning that 03-writing-style.md carries the voice/tone rules. This is a conscious trade-off; if voice-matching starts slipping in practice, restoring 02 to the reviewer's reading list is a one-line fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>