"firma" joins COMPOUND_PATTERNS so the glued Danish header "Firmanavn og by"
matches again; whole-token matching since #75 skipped both sheets of the
repository's own demonstration workbook with "Could not find header row".
Every other workbook converts byte-identically. Also folds the `unreachable`
status from #564 into the seen_jobs.json schema enum in the scrape spec.
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(scrape): use the full job_scraper/seen_jobs.json path in every step of the spec
Step 0 reads job_scraper/seen_jobs.json but Steps 1-4 and the rules used the bare
filename. Step 4 is where the file is written, so an agent following it literally
can create seen_jobs.json in the repo root, outside the **/job_scraper/seen_jobs.json
ignore rule, where it gets committed with the user's scrape history.
Adds a spec test that rejects bare references; relaxes the existing dedup-continuity
regex to accept the qualified path.
* docs(changelog): entry for #608
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Mads Lorentzen <madslorentzen_17@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(salary): accept BOM-prefixed UTF-8 data files
Fixes#594. Thanks to @rahul05ranjan for reporting the failure and identifying the decoder change.
* docs(changelog): entry for #602
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Mads Lorentzen <madslorentzen_17@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both specs said to match "on company + role" with "casefold + strip on
both fields", but a seen_jobs.json entry has title and no role key (the
job-scraper schema), so read literally the lookup never matched: /upskill
then weighted the same job twice, once as a tracker row and once as a
ranked entry - the double-count its dedupe step exists to prevent - and
/notion-sync split one job into two rows with different Keys.
tools/rank_state.py already does the cross-name join (tracker role
against entry title); both specs now say so.
Two derived tests read the entry schema and require the join wording to
name title for the entry and role for the tracker; they fail on master.
04-job-evaluation.md's Language Gate and job-scraper/search-queries.md's
query-language generation both read "your Languages table" from
01-candidate-profile.md, but the skeleton /reset wrote left "## Identity"
empty, so after a reset /rank and /scrape looked for a table the file no
longer had.
Carry "### Languages" and the table's header and separator rows in the
skeleton. The test derives both rows from the shipped file and pins that
the placeholder data row is not reintroduced; it fails on master.
Follow-up noted on #532.
month" and "2000-5000 requests per second" still failed /apply Step 5d:
each has a four-digit number next to the dash that happens to fall in
1900-2099, and the guide tells users to keep "--" in exactly those
prose ranges.
When both sides of the dash are bare numbers - the whole
whitespace-delimited token, outer punctuation stripped, matching
\d+(?:[.,]\d+)*[kKmM%]? with no year group among its parts - count the
match only if both are years. The salary band and the throughput range
pass; 2016-2024, 1990-2010 and "2016 - Present" still fail as before,
and a numerically formatted range (03/2016-07/2024, 01.2016 - 12.2024,
2016-03-2024-07, 2016/17-2018/19) is not a bare number on either side
and is still caught. On the stock CV with all three prose ranges on one
line, master reports three hits and this branch reports the one real
date.
Three new cases; the quantity one fails on master.
* fix(rank): retry postings that could not be fetched instead of expiring them
A posting /rank could not fetch (403, login wall, 404, timeout, empty
page) and one that is really closed both became `expired`, which is
terminal: `candidates` only selected `new`, so a transient failure on
ranking day removed a live job from the pipeline and the report
presented it as closed.
Shape per the maintainer's decisions on #534:
- Scoring agents return a third status, `unreachable` (with a short
`fetch_error`), after exhausting the 09-web-research.md escalation
order; `expired` stays for positive evidence of closure (closed page,
410, redirect to a listing page, passed deadline). A 404 is
`unreachable` first (#538 is that case).
- `candidates` selects `unreachable` alongside `new`. `apply` increments
`fetch_attempts`, keeps `first_unreachable` (UTC timestamp) and stores
`last_fetch_error` (short reason, no page text). After 3 attempts with
at least 48 hours between the first and the last it writes `expired`
with `expired_reason: "unreachable"` and returns the job once under
`gave_up`, which Step 5 prints under "Gave up, check manually" with
its URL. A later successful fetch, an explicit `expired` or a passed
deadline clears the retry fields. `--all` still revives everything.
- rank_state.py owns the status set (`AGENT_STATUSES`); `apply` rejects
any other status instead of reporting a misleading missing score, and
test_rank_command.py asserts rank.md's JSON contract names the same
set. A new `--now` option makes the 48-hour floor testable.
- rank.md's step text (Step 2 rules and contract, rule 6's --all note,
Step 4 fields, Step 5 report, Important Rule 1) updated together.
CHANGELOG under Changed: no existing entry carries the new status, so
no migration.
Reported by @ai-tvang in #534, who also proposed the time floor and the
give-up listing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(rank): expire an unreachable posting whose deadline has passed
Review on #564:
- The unreachable branch in apply returned before the deadline check the
scored path runs, and candidates hands out `new` entries whose stored
deadline has passed. So a posting that closed on 2026-09-20 and
returned 403 on 2026-10-05 was retried, then listed under "Gave up,
check manually" as possibly live. A passed stored deadline is now
checked first and takes the expired path, dropping the retry fields,
as on master and under rule 5. New test pins it.
- 09-web-research.md step 5 said that in /rank an unretrievable posting
is marked `expired`, so an agent following it could write a 403 off
and bring #534 back. It now says `unreachable` (framework_version
1.1.2 -> 1.1.3); the CHANGELOG entry says so.
- The report shows `attempt N` instead of `N/3`, which read 4/3 while a
job waited out the 48-hour floor, and job-scraper's dedup note names
`unreachable` alongside `ranked`/`expired`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(upstream_triage): force UTF-8 stdout and decode git output as UTF-8 (#544)
* test(tools-utf8): restore assertion in salary converter test and isolate upstream_triage test
* fix(apply,rank): route matching portal URLs to installed CLI detail before WebFetch (#535)
When given a URL belonging to an installed portal (e.g. LinkedIn, Jobnet), WebFetch frequently encounters login walls, bot-detection blocks, or 403s. Installed portal CLIs under .agents/skills/ already provide a dedicated detail command that fetches clean posting text and structured metadata directly from board APIs.
- In .claude/commands/apply.md Step 0, invoke the matching installed portal CLI's detail command first, falling back to WebFetch on failure.
- In 09-web-research.md, place the installed portal CLI detail command as the first rung of the escalation order, bumping framework_version to 1.1.2.
- In .claude/commands/rank.md Step 2, align scoring agents to use the portal CLI's detail command before WebFetch.
- In tests/test_apply_host_check.py, add spec and resolution tests ensuring portal CLI detail precedence is strictly asserted and verified.
* fix(apply,rank): route matching portal URLs to installed CLI detail before WebFetch (#535)
When given a URL belonging to an installed portal, WebFetch frequently encounters login walls, bot-detection blocks, or 403s. Installed portal CLIs under .agents/skills/ already provide a dedicated detail command that fetches clean posting text and structured metadata directly from board APIs.
- In .claude/commands/apply.md Step 0, invoke the matching installed portal CLI's detail command first, falling back to WebFetch on failure. Derive matching portal skills from board hosts in cli/src and url-reference.md.
- In 09-web-research.md, place the installed portal CLI detail command as the first rung of the escalation order, update subsequent step references, and bump framework_version to 1.1.2.
- In .claude/commands/rank.md Step 2, align scoring agents to use the portal CLI's detail command before WebFetch.
- In CHANGELOG.md, record the framework_version bump (1.1.1 -> 1.1.2) under [Unreleased] / ### Changed.
- In tests/test_apply_host_check.py, add spec and dynamic resolution tests ensuring portal CLI detail precedence is strictly asserted and verified across all discovered installed skills.
* Fix fork-skip guards for local test runs
The fork skip read GITHUB_REPOSITORY with an upstream fallback, so local runs on a fork always ran the upstream-only guards. Share one helper that checks the origin remote when the variable is unset. Fixes#496.
* test: accept the ssh:// origin form in the upstream-checkout helper
An upstream clone whose origin is ssh://git@github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search(.git)
must keep running the placeholder guards; the helper only knew the https and
scp-style forms. Folded in at maintainer rebase per the #524 review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Omarinho12345 <omarottelli720@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README and SETUP.md hardcoded the six shipped portals in four PowerShell/Bash
loops, so a portal added by /add-portal or borrowed from another fork was
skipped on a fresh clone. tools/install_portal_clis.py uses CI's discover-clis
glob, isolates per-CLI failures, and skips manifests with lifecycle scripts or
trustedDependencies.
The full-file skeletons for 01-candidate-profile.md and
02-behavioral-profile.md started at the "#" title, while the shipped
files open with a "---" block carrying framework_version. Applied as
written, one /reset profile left both files failing
tools/check_framework_version.py ("missing 'framework_version' in
frontmatter") and invisible to tools/check_upstream_updates.py, which
records a configuration error for a file with no local version - the
fork update path every fork is sent through.
Say to keep the frontmatter block and replace only what follows, with a
note under "Profile reset" that the marker is framework data, never
candidate data. The version is not hardcoded into the skeleton, where it
would go stale on the next bump. A derived test applies each skeleton
the way the step says and asserts the shipped file's version still
parses out unchanged; it fails on master for both files.
* fix(reset): target the headings the shipped skill files actually have
Two of /reset profile's Step 3 targets had drifted from the files they
rewrite.
The 05-cv-templates.md step anchored on a section beginning
"**Profile statement templates", a line the guide has never contained
(its heading is "**Create 2-3 profile statement templates for your main
role types:**"), so the wipe found nothing: the user's role-tailored
profile statements, and any *[Used for: ...]* statements /setup Path A
extracted from archived applications, survived a reset that reported
success.
The 02-behavioral-profile.md skeleton used headings the shipped file
does not have ("Strongest Behavioral Traits", "How I Work Best", a
truncated "Growth Areas") and dropped "## Core Behavioral Drives" - the
assessment table /setup collects and /interview reads - so one reset
left the file's headings permanently different from every other fork's.
Anchor on the real heading and re-emit it in the replacement; carry the
shipped headings in order in the skeleton. 01-candidate-profile.md and
07-interview-prep.md were already correct. Two new tests derive both
checks from the shipped files, so a renamed heading fails until /reset
follows it; both fail on master.
* test(reset): place the heading guards above the __main__ guard so a direct run sees them
python tests/test_reset_command.py ran only the five old tests; unittest
discover imports the module and saw all seven, which is why CI was green.
Also drop the CHANGELOG's claim that /setup and /interview name the Core
Behavioral Drives table - neither does.
SHIPPED_PORTAL_HOSTS was six names typed into the test and nothing tied
it to anything: a portal added by /add-portal fetches from a host the
copy never heard of, so its postings reached /apply classified
"unverified" while the suite stayed green, and a dropped portal left a
stale name behind.
apply.md rule 1 defines an installed portal as "any configured job portal
in .agents/skills/", so that tree is the source: the host literals in
each *-search/cli/src/**/*.ts (one BASE_URL per shipped CLI, www. dropped
so apex and subdomain both match). Discovery is by installation, not by
the enabled: flag - an installed-but-disabled board is still a legitimate
source for a pasted posting. classify_posting_host's default is the
discovered set, and a new class asserts every installed portal has a
discoverable host that classifies as installed_portal at the apex, under
www. and under a subdomain. The ATS apex list stays the fixed set it is.
Reported by Holo-Eter in #497; shape per the maintainer's note there.
The mixed-script rule from #514 appended the digest to `basis` as well,
so an empty title with a URL that carries no six-digit run moved from
"acme_https-example-com-jobs-abc-xyz" to "..._5ca8c6". Unreachable from
/scrape, which always passes a title, but a key is a pure function of the
posting and should not move for a case the rule was never about.
A lossy fragment still takes the digest; an empty title keeps the bare
basis or "untitled-<hash>" exactly as before #514. One new case pins the
pre-#514 output and fails on current master. The CHANGELOG example for
the Python-разработчик key is corrected to its real digest (python-fb29d7).
Follow-up suggested in the #514 merge note.
Both commands told the model to add to "Strongest Behavioral Traits" and
"How I Work Best" / "How [Candidate] Works Best" while also saying "match
existing structure", but the shipped file's headings are "Strongest
Behaviors" and "How You Work Best", so an inferred trait either opened a
duplicate near-identical section or was dropped.
The companion to #519, which fixed the same drift in /reset's skeleton.
Both bullets now name the shipped headings, and a derived test in each
command's suite reads the quoted section names and requires each to be a
## heading of the shipped file; both fail on master.
The hash fallbacks from #487 and #502 fired only when the slug was
completely empty. A mixed-script name kept its Latin or digit fragment
and skipped them: "Программист 1С" and "Аналитик 1С" at one company both
keyed as company-6d769a_1, "Python-разработчик" and "Python-аналитик" as
..._python, "Сбер AI" and "Яндекс AI" as ai_... /scrape Step 4 then
dropped the second posting as already seen, and because the dict key is
overwritten, --audit could not report the collision as a duplicate URL.
Treat the fold as lossy whenever it drops a letter outside the Latin
script, and let the existing fallbacks take over: the title half uses
the portal's numeric id or the URL hash with the fragment kept as a
readable prefix, the company half uses the NFC-casefold name hash with
the fragment as prefix. Latin letters that also lack a decomposition
(ø, æ, ß, ł) are deliberately not counted, so "Ørsted" still keys as
"rsted" and a live Danish seen_jobs.json does not re-key.
Seven new cases; the four collision cases fail on master.
_YEAR matched (19|20)\d{2} anywhere, so `2000` inside `120000` or `12000`
made a budget or throughput range typed with `--` read as an en-dashed
date range: "Grew budget DKK 120000-200000" and "12000-15000 events/s"
both failed /apply Step 5d, and the agent was sent to fix a date argument
that does not exist. The guide promises a numeric range with no year is
left alone.
Bound the year with (?<!\d) and (?!\d). "2016-2024" next to a longer
number is still caught. Two new cases; the numeric one fails on the
unbounded pattern.
* fix(check_framework_version): decode git diff output as UTF-8
run_git() passed subprocess.run(text=True) with no explicit encoding,
so it fell back to the host locale's default codec - cp1252 on
Windows - instead of UTF-8. Any non-ASCII byte in a modified
framework file's diff (e.g. an em dash in a profile edit) then raised
UnicodeDecodeError before the gate could evaluate the change, instead
of a pass/fail verdict. Reproduced on a real Windows checkout.
Pin encoding="utf-8" on the subprocess.run() call. Added a regression
test that patches subprocess.run and asserts run_git() always passes
encoding="utf-8" - confirmed it fails against the pre-fix code and
passes against the fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(check_framework_version): address review on UTF-8 decode fix
Per MadsLorentzen's review on PR #511:
- Add errors="replace" alongside encoding="utf-8" on the subprocess.run()
call, matching the convention used elsewhere in this repo (robots_check.py).
- Correct the docstring: an em dash does not crash the un-pinned decode
(cp1252 maps it fine); the actual trigger is a byte cp1252 leaves
undefined, e.g. Cyrillic Ё/ё, much CJK, or Á-class Latin.
- Correct "profile file" to "framework file" - the tool only diffs the
framework's own directories, not arbitrary profile files.
- Add a CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased] / Fixed naming the tool and test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(robots-check): stop a leading BOM or an undecodable rule from reading as allowed
Two decoding edge cases left the robots gate failing open. Both were
flagged as follow-ups in #506.
A robots.txt saved with a UTF-8 byte-order mark decodes to a body that
starts with U+FEFF, so its first field read as U+FEFF + "user-agent". A
leading "User-agent: *" went unseen, every rule in that group was
dropped for want of an agent, and "Disallow: /" read as allow-all.
_groups() and is_robots_body() now skip one leading U+FEFF, as Google's
reference parser does, which covers every caller of allowed(). This
predates #506: the old code-page decode hid the line the same way.
Since #506 pinned curl's output to UTF-8 with errors='replace', a
non-conformant robots.txt saved in a legacy code page (cp1254,
ISO-8859-9) with raw non-ASCII bytes in a rule decodes them to U+FFFD.
That rule can never match and was silently skipped. The new
has_undecodable_rule() treats such a body as unreadable, so the gate
returns UNCONFIRMED (exit 1). The field is named with U+FFFD removed, so
a stray byte before "Disallow" cannot hide the line either. U+FFFD in a
comment or another field (Sitemap, Crawl-delay) stays harmless, and
valid UTF-8 non-ASCII rules decide as before.
Nine new tests in two FAIL-OPEN REGRESSION classes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(changelog): record the robots_check BOM and U+FFFD fixes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Can Mugan <217335573+canmugan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
find_orphans() compared each line's left edge with the document margin:
an un-indented last line followed by an indented first line was an entry
header orphaned from its bullets. A list marker moves a line's left edge
without moving its text, so the rule misread two templates:
* one that merges each bullet's marker into its first line (#481): a
bullet wrapping across the break was reported as an orphaned header,
and a real orphaned header followed by such bullets was not reported;
* the stock CV, when its outer marker extracts as a line of its own: a
[Job Title] header left at the foot of a page, bullets overleaf, was
not reported (its text at x70.4 counts as indented), and a one-line
list item whose outer marker is set 1.3pt below it - so the marker
sorts last on the page - was reported as a split bullet although the
whole item is on that page.
Following discussion #481, the rule now reads text x:
* parse_pdf records where a line's text starts after leading
LIST_MARKERS words (Line.text_left, defaulted). The set is the agreed
Unicode bullets without the dashes (`• ‣ ▪ ● ·`): a bullet's second
line may open with an em dash, and the stock Honors item's second line
opens with an en dash. Other glyphs are text, so a line that merges
the stock outer marker (`○` on some setups, an emoji on others) keeps
the marker's x, as the left-edge rule read it;
* find_orphans compares the text x of a page's last printed line with
that of the next page's first printed line, and reports an orphaned
header when the latter is more than INDENT_PT further in. Bbox lines
whose tops are within SAME_PRINTED_LINE_PT (3pt) are one printed line:
pdftotext's rounded-yMin buckets split a line where a bold word sits
0.2pt off, or where a marker sits 1.3pt below its text. A line whose
text starts more than SET_IN_LIMIT_PT (60pt) past the margin is set
right or centred (a running header) and is skipped as the opener;
* a page ending on a marker with no text beside it keeps the lone-marker
report, with its condition and message unchanged.
Stock cv/main_example.tex, \vspace* of 0-600pt in 8pt steps before four
entries, 304 lualatex builds (and the same 304 with xelatex): this adds
15 reports, each a [Job Title] header at the foot of a page with its
bullets overleaf; the other 289 builds give byte-identical output. The
reported.
A two-line outer item whose marker sorts last and that wraps across the
break is no longer reported as a split bullet: it is read like the #481
wrapped bullet, which is expected clean.
Tests: TestOrphansReadTextX (13; 7 fixes and the wrapped two-line item
fail on master's logic, 5 pin behaviour master already had) and
TestTextStart (4). On Python 3.10-3.14 `python -W error::SyntaxWarning
-m unittest discover -s tests -t .` passes 520 tests (master 503);
lint_skills.py, check_framework_version.py and security_guards.py OK.
* fix(job_key): hash the URL alone so a re-listed non-Latin title keeps one key
* docs(changelog): record the job_key URL-identity fix
Adds the [Unreleased] / Fixed entry for #501, naming tools/job_key.py and
tests/test_job_key_url_identity.py.
The entry states the migration consequence in bold: an entry written before
this fix, for a non-Latin title on a portal without a numeric id, re-keys once
on the next scrape. It also names where those entries surface,
keys_not_matching_current_rule, and that --audit never rewrites them.
Verified that claim rather than asserting it. A seen_jobs.json holding one
entry under its pre-fix key for a Cyrillic-titled freehire URL reports
keys_not_matching_current_rule: 1 under the fixed audit. The same audit over a
real 884-entry seen_jobs.json reports 0, because those keys are the
company_title form that is_canonical() excludes from the drift check.
_fetch() ran curl with text=True and no encoding, so Python decoded the
response with the Windows ANSI code page. On a byte that code page leaves
undefined (0x81 in cp1252 and cp1254, 0x9e in cp1254) subprocess's pipe
reader thread died, stdout came back None, rpartition() raised
AttributeError, and the gate printed "UNCONFIRMED (AttributeError)". That
fails closed, but it blocked the browser-header retry 09-web-research.md
permits on hosts such as tr.indeed.com (a UTF-8 CJK Disallow rule) and
kap.org.tr (a UTF-8 Turkish 404 page).
Pin encoding='utf-8', errors='replace' on the call (RFC 9309: robots.txt
is UTF-8), as verify_pdf.py and verify_layout.py already do. Decision
rules and the fail-closed handling of real read failures are unchanged.
The regression tests swap curl for a child process that prints the real
bytes, so the actual subprocess decode path runs with _fetch's own
kwargs, and pin cp1254 when no encoding is passed so a UTF-8 host cannot
pass the bug by luck. Both fail on master.
Co-authored-by: Can Mugan <217335573+canmugan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
FindNonAsciiDateRangesTests' docstring (from #498) quotes the regex `\s*`
in a non-raw string. `\s` is an invalid escape sequence, so Python 3.12+
prints a SyntaxWarning for it (CPython gh-98401) when
tests/test_verify_pdf.py is compiled. It is in this repo's own CI log
for a45bbd1 on 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14, at tests/test_verify_pdf.py:75, while
the run stays green. Under `-W error::SyntaxWarning` the module fails to
import and the whole test_verify_pdf suite drops out of the run.
Escaped in the docstring. ToolsCompileWithoutWarnings (#480) only compiled
tools/*.py, which is why this got through; it now compiles tests/*.py too.
With the unescaped docstring it fails naming tests/test_verify_pdf.py, and
it passes with the fix.
Verification on Python 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14, from a clean
bytecode cache: `python -W error::SyntaxWarning -m unittest discover -s
tests -t .` OK (501 tests, the same count as master),
`tools/lint_skills.py`, `tools/check_framework_version.py`,
`tools/security_guards.py`.
* feat(verify_pdf): add --ascii-dates, the non-folding check for the documented date-range rule (#385)
05-cv-templates.md records a real Workday import that dropped a role's
end date because `2016--2024` reaches the text layer as 2016<U+2013>2024,
and tells Step 5d to confirm every entry's years are joined by an ASCII
hyphen. Nothing executed that. The natural probe, --contains "2016-2024",
failed identically for "en-dashed" and "absent" before #458 and passes on
both since, because the fold maps the en-dash back to "-" on purpose.
Add --ascii-dates: scan the raw text layer (never the fold) for a year
joined to any Unicode dash or the minus sign and fail naming each hit
with its line and code point. A year on either side of the dash is
enough (Mar 2016 - Jul 2016, 2016 - Present); a numeric range with no
year is not a date. The dump is still written before the check fails.
Wire it in: Step 5d's extraction command carries the flag and the
"Dates recognizable" item points at it, keeping the bare single-year
half as a read-through; the guide's "add this to the step 5d checks"
paragraph names the command (framework_version 1.4.4 -> 1.4.5); the
upstream-only CI assertion runs it on the stock CV.
Demonstrated on the stock template compiled with lualatex through both
extractors: a \cventry{2016--2024} build fails with U+2013 while
--contains "2016-2024" passes on it; the \cventry{2016-2024} build passes
both; the untouched stock CV passes the CI assertion.
Ten new test_verify_pdf.py cases. Proposed by 9scorp4 in Discussion #385.
* fix(verify_pdf): --ascii-dates only joins a year and a dash across horizontal whitespace
`\s*` between the year and the dash also matched a newline, so a heading
ending in an ASCII date ("Heading 1988-1994\n- note") joined the dash
that merely opened the next line and was reported as a U+2013 range; the
mirror shape ("Six Sigma -\n2016 onwards") did the same. Both are real
text-layer shapes: a dash used as a bullet, a wrapped prose line.
Match horizontal whitespace only ([^\S\n]*). Every existing case still
passes; three fixtures pin the two newline shapes and the same-line
spaced dash that must still be caught.
Found in review by yang2632, with the regex and the fixture.
`tools/verify_layout.py`'s module docstring explains which documents trigger
the Poppler `-bbox` crash, and names the macro whose absence causes it:
`\hypersetup{pdftitle=...}`. In a non-raw docstring `\h` is an invalid escape
sequence, so compiling the module prints
SyntaxWarning: "\h" is an invalid escape sequence.
Such sequences will not work in the future. Did you mean "\\h"?
on Python 3.12+ (CPython gh-98401 promoted the long-standing
DeprecationWarning to a SyntaxWarning). The 3.15 language reference still
documents the sequence as a SyntaxWarning, with a SyntaxError only "in a
future Python version".
This is on the real path, not a constructed one: /apply Step 5b runs
`python3 tools/verify_layout.py <pdf>` once per document, so the first
invocation after any source change prints the warning into the middle of the
layout report a user is reading to judge their CV. It is also visible in this
repo's own CI log, where `python -m unittest discover -s tests -t . -v` prints
it above the test results.
Reproduce on master:
python3 -W error::SyntaxWarning -c "compile(open('tools/verify_layout.py',
encoding='utf-8').read(), 'tools/verify_layout.py', 'exec')"
raises on master; after this change it is silent.
Escaping (rather than making the docstring raw) keeps the surrounding prose
unchanged, and the single-backtick markup matches the other inline literals in
the same docstring. The rendered text still reads `\hypersetup{...}`.
The new `ToolsCompileWithoutWarnings` case is a pure `compile()` of the source
text of every `tools/*.py` inside `warnings.catch_warnings(record=True)` and
asserts no `SyntaxWarning` or `DeprecationWarning` (3.10 and 3.11 report the
same escape as a DeprecationWarning) - no cache file, no temp file, so it runs
the same on Windows (py_compile's atomic rename over an open
NamedTemporaryFile is what the first version tripped on). It fails on master
and passes here on every Python in the CI matrix, and it guards the next
docstring that quotes a macro.
Verification on Python 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14: `python3 -m unittest discover -s
tests -t .` (488 tests OK; master is 487), `python3 -W error::SyntaxWarning`
compile of every `tools/*.py`, `tests/test_changelog_structure.py`.
A piped stdout on Windows defaults to the ANSI code page (cp1252 on most
Western installs). rank_state.py printed titles and companies with
ensure_ascii=False, so one Cyrillic, CJK, Devanagari, Polish or Turkish
posting ended /rank with UnicodeEncodeError. job_key --audit, salary_lookup,
convert_salary_excel and verify_layout failed the same way.
Each tool now reconfigures stdout and stderr to UTF-8 at entry. The new
tests run every tool in a child process with a cp1252 stdout forced through
PYTHONIOENCODING, so Linux CI reproduces the Windows failure.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WPXraLZ4i7UW4xGn9tVcox
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(add-template): keep a registered template's intermediates in build/
A template registered via /add-template declared a bare compile command, so
every new template scattered .aux/.log/.out beside its source, and Step 4 had to
enumerate six LaTeX extensions to clean up after its test compile.
- The elicited LaTeX command now redirects intermediates to build/ with the
portable -output-directory (not the MiKTeX-only -aux-directory), creates the
folder (TeX Live does not), and moves the PDF back beside the source where
/apply reads it. A leading rm -f ensures a failed compile, which skips the mv,
never leaves a stale PDF there.
- Toolchains with nothing to redirect (typst compile) keep their command, and
registration never blocks on the rule. If the redirect alone breaks a
template (e.g. \include from a subfolder), it is dropped and recorded under
Known pitfalls.
- The manifest example shows the pattern, Step 4 cleanup deletes build/
instead of listing extensions, and the ACTIVE-TEMPLATE block tells /apply to
run the command from the output directory and remove build/ in Step 5e.
- build/ is gitignored.
Stock templates are untouched, so /apply Step 5e stays.
* docs(add-template): drop the MiKTeX aside from the build directory rule
* test(add-template): pin the build directory compile command
Step 5b's prose said "Page count is not checked here - that is
verify_pdf.py --pages's job, and Step 5d already runs it", and
verify_layout.py's docstring declines to measure page count for the same
reason. Step 5d's only verify_pdf.py call is --dump-text, and no step in
the workflow passed --pages at all (only the upstream-only CI assertion on
the stock examples does), so the hard 2-page CV and 1-page cover letter
limits were enforced by nothing but the visual PDF read - the "measure
first, then look" failure 5b was written to stop.
5b now runs verify_pdf.py --pages 2 on the CV and --pages 1 on the cover
letter ahead of verify_layout.py, names the ACTIVE-TEMPLATE page limit as
the substitute for a custom template, and the deferral sentence points at
those lines instead of at 5d.
tests/test_apply_page_count.py pins the invocations, their counts, their
order relative to the layout measurement, and that no prose defers the
check to a step that does not run it; all four cases fail on master.
format_entry appended "* N/A = Too few employees to publish (privacy)"
under every category table, including one where every row has an index,
so the output asserted a suppression that never happened - the residual
noted on #470. Set a flag in the N/A* branch and print the footnote only
when it fired; a table with a suppressed row renders exactly as before.
Two FormatEntryTests cases pin both directions; the "omitted" case fails
on master.
The pairing loop required a non-empty derived category name on both
sides, but a header with no category word - "Count" + "Index", Danish
"Antal" + "Lønindeks" - strips to an empty name, so the simplest layout
the README advertises ("auto-pairs count/index columns") came out as two
unrelated standalone categories:
{"count": {"count": 500}, "index": {"index": 108.5}}
salary_lookup then rendered a "Count 500 N/A*" row above an
"Index - 108.5" row, and its footnote read the N/A* as "too few
employees to publish (privacy)" - a false statement about a company whose
headcount is in the file, shown during /apply's salary step. Any suffix
("Antal alle") made pairing work, which is why the shipped tests, all
suffixed, never saw it.
Pair on equal derived names, empty included, and give the nameless pair
the README's top-level category name (all_employees). A bare "Antal" with
no bare index column still stays a standalone count; named pairs
alongside are untouched.
Four new cases in test_convert_salary_excel.py, one of them rendering the
converter's output through salary_lookup.format_entry; all four fail
against the old pairing rule.
* fix(gmail-sync): strip CSV-breaking characters from the email subject
Step 7a interpolated the raw subject line of a received email into the
`notes` column of job_search_tracker.csv. No writer here emits a quoted
tracker field, so an unescaped comma splits the row - for csv.DictReader
just as much as for a naive split, which matters because
tools/rank_state.py is the repo's only machine reader and uses exactly
that. `notes` is column 10 of 14, so a subject as ordinary as
"Re: Your application, Data Scientist" shifted cv_file,
cover_letter_file and source a column left. A line break is worse: it
ends the row and starts a second one.
The rule now sits on the append instruction itself rather than in a
general note a writer can miss. The subject survives verbatim in the
archive's outcome.md, which is Markdown and carries no such constraint.
/outcome Step 4 (outcome.md:195) is also free-form and has the same
exposure, but its text is model-authored in a turn the user is watching
rather than copied from third-party mail unattended. Left out
deliberately, to be filed separately.
* fix(outcome): keep the Step 4 tracker note free of CSV-breaking characters
/outcome Step 4 appended "a short dated note" to `notes` with no
constraint on its content, the same exposure /gmail-sync Step 7a had:
nothing quotes a tracker field, so `rejected, no feedback given` shifts
cv_file, cover_letter_file and source a column left under
csv.DictReader, and a line break ends the row. The append instruction
now requires a note with no commas, double quotes or line breaks.
Folded in at the maintainer's request on #455 so one entry and one rule
cover both free-form writers. The CSV-safety tests move out of
test_gmail_sync_command.py into test_tracker_notes_csv_safe.py, where a
CASES table pins the rule on each writer's append line.
verify_layout.py's skipped: message blamed only the xpdf-based pdftotext that
Git for Windows puts ahead of Poppler in PATH. A real Poppler can abort too:
26.0x before 26.05 crashes -bbox/-bbox-layout/-htmlmeta on a PDF whose Info
dictionary carries an empty string in any field, and hyperref writes exactly
that for every field it does not set. A lualatex/pdflatex document built with
hyperref and no \hypersetup{pdftitle=...} - an ordinary /add-template CV
template, not a malformed one - hits this with a working Poppler installed,
and the old message sent the reader to check their PATH when nothing was
wrong with it.
Named both causes in the raised message, the code comment above it, and the
module docstring. Behavior is unchanged: either cause still degrades to
skipped: exit 2, not exit 1, since a broken extractor is still not a broken
document.
Added test_poppler_abort_on_empty_info_string_names_that_cause_too, mocking
subprocess.run to raise CalledProcessError the way a real Poppler 26.0x abort
does (exit 1, a libc++abi out_of_range trace on stderr) rather than the
xpdf case's exit 99 - the two failures are the same exception type with
different exit codes and stderr text, so the message has to actually
distinguish them, not just catch the one class. Negative control: this test
fails against the pre-fix message with "'Poppler aborted' not found in
'...a pdftotext without -bbox is usually the xpdf build...'".
Thanks to @main-sounds-audio for the report and the isolated repro (which
field, which Poppler modes, five runs of five) that pinned this to Poppler's
own upstream regression (issue #1699, fixed in 26.05.0) rather than an
extraction-library swap.
Fixes#451
Rudy Mizrahi Celekli