py/ai-job-search
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search.git synced 2026-09-17 00:26:26 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(apply): restore 02-behavioral-profile.md to reviewer reading list

Browse Source 
Brings 02-behavioral-profile.md back into the reviewer's reading list (it
was dropped in the earlier token-efficiency refactor). The reviewer now
reads four files: 01 (candidate profile), 02 (behavioral profile), 03
(writing style), 04 (job evaluation). The LaTeX template files (05, 06)
remain excluded, since those govern structural/LaTeX concerns the drafter
already applied.

The behavioral profile is there to let the reviewer cross-check whether
the cover letter's voice matches the candidate's natural register -
something 03-writing-style.md does not encode (03 has the universal rules
like "no em-dashes, no cliches"; 02 has the per-person register like
"Collaborator PI should not be given a combative solo-hero tone").

Also cross-references 02 explicitly in the Part B "Tone and style issues"
category so the reviewer actually uses it during critique rather than
just skimming it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mads Lorentzen
2026-04-24 20:14:59 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.7
parent 906ac1bc19
commit fa9c422d26
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.claude/commands/apply.md
+5 -4
View File
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Write both files to disk. Keep the exact text of both drafts in working memory
## Step 3: REVIEWER - Research & Critique ## Step 3: REVIEWER - Research & Critique
Use the **Agent tool** to spawn a `general-purpose` reviewer agent. The reviewer gets a fresh context, so pass the drafts **inline in the prompt** below (do not make the reviewer Read them). Scope the reviewer's file reads to content-critique essentials only — the reviewer does not need the LaTeX template files (`05`, `06`) or the behavioral profile (`02`) to critique content. Use the **Agent tool** to spawn a `general-purpose` reviewer agent. The reviewer gets a fresh context, so pass the drafts **inline in the prompt** below (do not make the reviewer Read them). Scope the reviewer's file reads to content-critique essentials only — the reviewer does not need the LaTeX template files (`05`, `06`) to critique content, since those govern structural/LaTeX concerns the drafter already applied.
Replace `<COMPANY>`, `<ROLE>`, `<INSERT_JOB_POSTING_TEXT_HERE>`, `<INSERT_CV_DRAFT_HERE>`, and `<INSERT_COVER_LETTER_DRAFT_HERE>` with actual values before dispatching. Replace `<COMPANY>`, `<ROLE>`, `<INSERT_JOB_POSTING_TEXT_HERE>`, `<INSERT_CV_DRAFT_HERE>`, and `<INSERT_COVER_LETTER_DRAFT_HERE>` with actual values before dispatching.
@@ -102,12 +102,13 @@ Use WebSearch and WebFetch to research:
- Company culture and values - Company culture and values
### 2. Read Reference Materials (content-critique only) ### 2. Read Reference Materials (content-critique only)
Read these three files — and only these — to ground your critique: Read these four files — and only these — to ground your critique:
- `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/01-candidate-profile.md` - `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/01-candidate-profile.md`
- `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/02-behavioral-profile.md` — use this specifically to check whether the cover letter's voice matches the candidate's natural register. A "Collaborator" PI profile, for example, should not be given a combative, solo-hero tone; a "Persuader" profile should not be given over-hedged, apologetic phrasing.
- `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/03-writing-style.md` - `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/03-writing-style.md`
- `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/04-job-evaluation.md` - `.claude/skills/job-application-assistant/04-job-evaluation.md`
Do NOT read `02-behavioral-profile.md`, `05-cv-templates.md`, or `06-cover-letter-templates.md` — those are structural/behavioral references the drafter already applied and are not needed for content critique. Do NOT read `05-cv-templates.md` or `06-cover-letter-templates.md` — those govern LaTeX structure the drafter already applied and are not needed for content critique.
### 3. Drafts to Review ### 3. Drafts to Review
Both drafts are provided inline below. Do NOT use the Read tool on the draft files — use these exact texts. Both drafts are provided inline below. Do NOT use the Read tool on the draft files — use these exact texts.
@@ -146,7 +147,7 @@ Prose suggestions grouped by category. Produce each category even if your findin
- **Missed keywords/requirements** — what to add and roughly where, if it cannot be expressed as a clean string replacement - **Missed keywords/requirements** — what to add and roughly where, if it cannot be expressed as a clean string replacement
- **Company/department-specific angles** — connections between experience and the company's strategic priorities, based on your research - **Company/department-specific angles** — connections between experience and the company's strategic priorities, based on your research
- **Action-oriented reframing** — identify passive, generic, or low-energy statements and suggest action-oriented rewrites. Use this category especially for structural weakness that doesn't fit a single-sentence swap (e.g., "the whole opening paragraph reads as passive — restructure around your single strongest match to the posting"). - **Action-oriented reframing** — identify passive, generic, or low-energy statements and suggest action-oriented rewrites. Use this category especially for structural weakness that doesn't fit a single-sentence swap (e.g., "the whole opening paragraph reads as passive — restructure around your single strongest match to the posting").
- **Tone and style issues** — check against `03-writing-style.md`. Flag any issues with tone, formality, or voice (cliches, hedging, over-humility, inconsistent register). - **Tone and style issues** — check against `03-writing-style.md` AND `02-behavioral-profile.md`. Flag any issues with tone, formality, or voice (cliches, hedging, over-humility, inconsistent register), and specifically flag any mismatch between the letter's voice and the candidate's natural register as described in the behavioral profile.
**CRITICAL RULE:** All suggestions must be grounded in actual profile data. Do NOT suggest fabricating skills, experience, or achievements. If a requirement is a gap, say so honestly and suggest how to frame adjacent experience instead. **CRITICAL RULE:** All suggestions must be grounded in actual profile data. Do NOT suggest fabricating skills, experience, or achievements. If a requirement is a gap, say so honestly and suggest how to frame adjacent experience instead.