diff --git a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3bf0178 --- /dev/null +++ b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + + +## What changed and why + +## Failing case / reproduction (for fixes) + +## Verification + diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index 6a4d89f..3bba984 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ Reviews here are empirical. Bug reports are reproduced on master before the fix Market-specific skills are genuinely valuable - they just live in forks, where their maintainers can test them and their users can find them. +One practical warning: when you open a PR from a fork, GitHub targets this upstream repo by default, not your own - three personalized-fork PRs landed here by accident in a single week ([#155], [#162], [#165]). Check the "base repository" dropdown before publishing. + ## Porting to another AI runtime? Forks too Claude Code is the reference runtime: it is what the maintainer runs daily and what every methodology change is verified on. A parallel command tree for another runtime (Codex, Antigravity, Gemini CLI, ...) would ship untested on every change - CI cannot run those harnesses - and each accepted runtime makes the next one harder to refuse. It is the same arithmetic that keeps market-specific portals in forks. @@ -93,3 +95,6 @@ Questions and proposals are welcome in [Discussions](https://github.com/MadsLore [#73]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/issues/73 [#75]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/issues/75 [#76]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/issues/76 +[#155]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/pull/155 +[#162]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/pull/162 +[#165]: https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search/pull/165