feat(apply,interview): write confirmed facts back to the profile in the same turn (#211)

* feat(apply,interview): write confirmed facts back to the profile in the same turn

The grounding audit added in #185 removes any claim the three sources do
not support. That is right, and it has a consequence the framework did
not close: the audit cannot tell a fabrication from a real fact the user
stated out loud in an earlier session. Both look identical to it - absent
from the sources - and both get stripped.

So a fact that surfaces in conversation and is never written down is lost
silently. A real metric the user confirmed disappears from every
subsequent CV, and nothing reports that it happened.

Adds a standing rule to /apply: when the user confirms, corrects or
supplies a fact not already in 01-candidate-profile.md, write it there in
the same turn and bump framework_version. 01 is one of the audit's three
sources, so the fact is grounded on the next run.

Adds the same exception to /interview rule 5, which previously forbade
touching profile files outright. Interview prep is where new facts
surface most often - a recalled metric, a corrected scope, a filled-in
STAR stub - and prep files are not a substitute for the profile.

Notes the source-consistency case explicitly: a fact added to 01 that
CLAUDE.md and the master CV do not mention is an absence, not a
contradiction, so it does not trip the audit's profile-consistency
warning. If the new fact corrects either of those, fix it there too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fixup(apply,interview): drop framework_version bump from write-back rule

Bumping 01's framework_version on a personal fact write-back corrupts
check_upstream_updates.py's upstream_version > local_version signal, and
diverges from /setup and /expand precedent where version tracks the
file's structure, not personal-data edits to its content.

Per MadsLorentzen review on PR #211.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/commands/interview.md

@@ -104,4 +104,6 @@ If Step 3 drafted new STAR answers the user approved for keeps, remind them thos
 2. **Honesty on gaps.** Weak matches get bridge answers (acknowledge → adjacent experience → learning path), never invented experience. Same rule as everywhere else in this repo.
 3. **Verified research only.** Company specifics go in the pack only after independent confirmation. Interviewer notes stick to public professional information.
 4. **Stage-appropriate prep.** A phone screen pack and a final-round pack are different documents; recorded feedback from earlier stages takes priority over generic question lists.
-5. **Write only to the application archive.** The prep pack lands in `documents/applications/<company>_<role>/`; framework and profile files are never edited, except appending user-approved STAR examples to `07-interview-prep.md` on explicit request.
+5. **Write only to the application archive** — with one exception. The prep pack lands in `documents/applications/<company>_<role>/`; framework files are not edited, except appending user-approved STAR examples to `07-interview-prep.md` on explicit request.
+
+   **The exception is `01-candidate-profile.md`.** Interview prep is where new facts surface most often: the user recalls a metric, corrects a scope, or fills in a STAR stub. When that happens, write the fact into the profile, as well as putting it in the prep pack. A fact recorded only in prep material reads as unsupported to a later drafting session and gets stripped from CVs as a fabrication. Prep files are not a substitute for the profile.