py/ai-job-search
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search.git synced 2026-09-17 00:26:26 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(upskill): give Step 3.3 a rule for blank fit_rating rows

Browse Source 
/outcome-created tracker rows (applications made outside the workflow)
never got a fit evaluation, so fit_rating is blank - and Step 3.3's
weight formula divides by it with no stated rule. Blank read as 0 means
weight 1.0, the maximum: the job the framework knows least about would
dominate the heatmap and the learning plan. Blank now falls back to a
matched ranked entry's rank_score, else skip+count+report once - the
same pattern the skill already applies to missing gaps. Review finding
F29 (2026-08-19).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mads Lorentzen
2026-08-19 19:54:32 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 57e82d2b59
commit 0e054f16e7
3 changed files with 29 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.claude/skills/upskill/SKILL.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ This mode now merges two sources — tracker rows (Step 2.1) and ranked postings
1. **Dedupe.** Match tracker rows against ranked entries on case-insensitive company + role (casefold + strip on both fields) — the same match `/notion-sync`'s Step 2 describes. A job present in both counts once.
2. **Recorded gaps beat inferred skills.** For any job that has a recorded `gaps` array (from a ranked entry, or from a tracker row that matched one), use those gap bullets directly as the skill list for that job instead of inferring from `role`/`sector`/`notes`. For a ranked-only job with no `gaps` (already skipped and counted in Step 2.3) or a tracker-only row, fall back to inferring likely required skills from `role`, `sector`, and `notes` — optionally WebFetch the row's `source` URL for more detail, but skip if the URL is missing or dead.
3. **One weight per job**, both 0–100 on the same scale: `(100 - fit_rating) / 100` for tracker rows, `(100 - rank_score) / 100` for ranked-only rows. If a job is in both (Step 3.1 matched it), prefer the tracker's numeric `fit_rating` for the weight.
3. **One weight per job**, both 0–100 on the same scale: `(100 - fit_rating) / 100` for tracker rows, `(100 - rank_score) / 100` for ranked-only rows. If a job is in both (Step 3.1 matched it), prefer the tracker's numeric `fit_rating` for the weight. A **blank or non-numeric `fit_rating`** (rows `/outcome` creates for applications made outside the workflow never got a fit evaluation) contributes no weight: fall back to a matched ranked entry's `rank_score` when Step 3.1 found one, otherwise skip the row, count it, and report the count once in the terminal — the same treatment Step 2.3 gives a missing `gaps` field, and for the same reason. Never treat a blank as 0: that reads as weight 1.0, the maximum, and lets the one job the framework knows nothing about dominate the heatmap.
4. **Score.** Build a **skill frequency map**: for each extracted skill (recorded gap bullet or inferred skill), count how many jobs mention it, then multiply each job's contribution by its weight from Step 3.3. Track whether each contribution came from a recorded gap or an inferred one, for Step 5's provenance column.
Final score for each skill: `sum of (weight × occurrence)` across all jobs.