--- title: Oblivious Transfer description: The base OT and correlated OT extension underneath threshold ECDSA — simplest (Verified Simplest OT) and kos (KOS15 cOT extension). sidebar: order: 6 icon: shuffle --- :::note[These are internal building blocks, not a user-facing API] `ot/base/simplest` and `ot/extension/kos` exist to serve [`tecdsa/dklsv1`](/threshold/threshold-ecdsa). They are exported because the tECDSA packages need them across package boundaries, not because application code is meant to call them. If you are building a wallet, use [MPC Enclave](/identity/mpc-enclave); if you are building a signing service, use the `dklsv1` iterators. This page is here so you can *understand and audit* the layer beneath tECDSA, and so that a `simplest.SenderOutput` appearing in a DKG result type is not a mystery. ::: ## What oblivious transfer is, and why ECDSA needs it In 1-out-of-2 OT the sender holds two strings `m_0`, `m_1`; the receiver holds a choice bit `b`. After the protocol the receiver knows `m_b` and nothing about `m_{1-b}`, and the sender learns nothing about `b`. ECDSA needs this because signing requires computing `k^{-1}(H(m) + r·sk)` where `k` and `sk` are both *split across two parties*. Adding shares is free; multiplying them is not. The standard two-party trick is to expand one party's secret into bits, have the other party offer a correlated pair per bit, and let OT select. Sum the selections and you have an additive sharing of the product, with neither side having learned a factor. That is precisely what `sign.MultiplySender` / `MultiplyReceiver` do, and `kos` is the OT engine they drive. ## Two layers, one reason Base OT costs public-key operations — a Schnorr proof, a scalar multiplication per instance. A single ECDSA signature needs thousands of OTs. Running thousands of base OTs would be intolerably slow. **OT extension** fixes this. You run a small fixed number of base OTs once — `kos.Kappa` = 256 of them, the computational security parameter — and then stretch that seed material into arbitrarily many OTs using nothing but hashing and binary-field arithmetic. In `kos` each extension produces `L = 2·Kappa + 2·s = 672` correlated OTs (with `s = 80`, the statistical security parameter) from that one seed set. So the pipeline is: **`simplest` once → `kos` many times.** Run during DKG. Its outputs (`SenderOutput` for Bob, `ReceiverOutput` for Alice) are persisted as part of the DKG result and reused for every subsequent signature. Consumes the persisted seed OT results and produces the 672 correlated OTs a signature needs, in three cheap rounds. :::warning[Roles cross between the layers] `NewCOtSender` takes a `*simplest.ReceiverOutput`, and `NewCOtReceiver` takes a `*simplest.SenderOutput`. The constructor docs flag this explicitly — "note the reversal of roles". Wire them the intuitive way and the protocol fails. ::: ## `ot/base/simplest` — Verified Simplest OT The package doc names its lineage precisely: "Verified Simplest OT" as defined in "protocol 7" of [DKLs18](https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/499.pdf), with the original Simplest OT from [CC15](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/267.pdf). Multiple choice bits run in parallel, and it is implemented as a **Random OT** — the sender does not choose its messages; both are random pads produced by the protocol. ### Security model, from the source - The "Verified" prefix is the point: rounds 4–6 are a challenge/response/opening phase that lets the receiver detect a cheating sender. This is the **maliciously secure** variant of Simplest OT, not the semi-honest one. - Ideal functionalities are instantiated concretely, and the package says which: ZKP Schnorr realizes the `F^{R_{DL}}_{ZK}` zero-knowledge functionality, and *"We have used HMAC for realizing the Random Oracle Hash function, the key for HMAC is received as input to the protocol."* The HMAC key is the `uniqueSessionId`. - Session binding uses a Merlin transcript, initialised with the domain string `"Coinbase_DKLs_SeedOT"` and immediately absorbing `uniqueSessionId`. ### Construction ```go import ( "crypto/rand" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/core/curves" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/ot/base/simplest" ) curve := curves.K256() // Fresh, unpredictable, and identical on both sides. See the danger callout. uniqueSessionId := [simplest.DigestSize]byte{} if _, err := rand.Read(uniqueSessionId[:]); err != nil { return err } const batchSize = 256 // must be a multiple of 8 sender, err := simplest.NewSender(curve, batchSize, uniqueSessionId) if err != nil { return err } receiver, err := simplest.NewReceiver(curve, batchSize, uniqueSessionId) if err != nil { return err } ``` `DigestSize = 32` — the hash length, and also the plaintext/ciphertext size for the optional encryption steps. ### The eight interleaved rounds As in tECDSA, the numbers form one global sequence across both parties; the sender owns the odd rounds and the receiver the even ones. `ot/ottest.RunSimplestOT` wires all of it up: ```go import "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/ot/ottest" // Creates both parties, runs rounds 1–6, and returns their outputs. senderOutput, receiverOutput, err := ottest.RunSimplestOT(curve, batchSize, uniqueSessionId) ``` Its own doc says it is "a utility function used _only_ during various tests". The sequence it performs, which is the canonical call order: Sender computes its key pair `B = b·G` and returns a Schnorr proof of knowledge of `b`. Protocol 7, step 1. Receiver verifies the proof (step 2) and performs the Pad Transfer (step 3), returning the masked choices — the paper's `A` values, in compressed form. Its own random choice bits were generated in `NewReceiver`. Steps 4 and 5. Sender derives both one-time pads per instance and emits the challenges `xi`. Step 6. Start of the Verify phase: the receiver returns `rho'` for the sender to check. Step 7. Aborts if `rho' != H(H(rho^0))`. On success the sender opens its challenges. Step 8, the last verification. Aborts unless `H(rho^w)` matches what the receiver computed itself *and* `xi == H(opening_0) XOR H(opening_1)`. After this returns nil the random OT is complete and `Output` is valid on both sides. `sender.Round7Encrypt(messages)` and `receiver.Round8Decrypt(ciphertext)` bootstrap the random OT into an actual OT of chosen messages. The package doc states these are optional and that "in the setting where this OT is used as the seed OT in an OT Extension protocol, the encryption and decryption steps are not needed" — so tECDSA never calls them. ### Outputs The correctness invariant, which the tests assert directly: $$ \texttt{ReceiverOutput.OneTimePadDecryptionKey}[i] = \texttt{SenderOutput.OneTimePadEncryptionKeys}[i][\texttt{RandomChoiceBits}[i]] $$ The optional message layer is `SenderOutput.Encrypt(plaintexts)` (protocol step 9) and `ReceiverOutput.Decrypt(ciphertexts)` (step 10); the round wrappers above just call these. `ExtractBitFromByteVector(vector []byte, index int) byte` reads the `index`-th bit of a packed vector, little-endian both across and within bytes — needed to interpret `PackedRandomChoiceBits` by hand. ### Streaming helpers ```go senderPipe, receiverPipe := simplest.NewPipeWrappers() errorsChannel := make(chan error, 2) go func() { errorsChannel <- simplest.SenderStreamOTRun(sender, senderPipe) }() go func() { errorsChannel <- simplest.ReceiverStreamOTRun(receiver, receiverPipe) }() for i := 0; i < 2; i++ { if err := <-errorsChannel; err != nil { return err } } ``` `SenderStreamOTRun(sender *Sender, rw io.ReadWriter) error` and `ReceiverStreamOTRun(receiver *Receiver, rw io.ReadWriter) error` run the whole six-round process over one `io.ReadWriter` — a websocket in practice — handling all encoding and decoding. The docs frame the purpose as "conveniently bundling up the entire seed OT process, for use in tests". `NewPipeWrappers()` returns a connected in-memory pair for driving both sides in one process. ## `ot/extension/kos` — correlated OT extension Maliciously secure OT extension, "Protocol 9" of DKLs18, originally [KOS15](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/546.pdf) — both cited in the package doc. This is *correlated* OT: the receiver supplies a choice vector, the sender supplies input scalars `alpha_j`, and the two outputs add to `alpha_j` where the choice bit is 1 and to zero where it is 0. That additive-sharing-of-a-selected-value shape is exactly what the multiplication protocol consumes. ### Constants | Constant | Value | Meaning | | --- | --- | --- | | `Kappa` | 256 | Computational security parameter — and the number of base OTs required | | `KappaBytes` | 32 | `Kappa >> 3` | | `L` | 672 | cOT batch size, `2*Kappa + 2*s` with `s = 80` (statistical security parameter) | | `COtBlockSizeBytes` | 84 | `L >> 3` — size of the packed choice vector | | `OtWidth` | 2 | Scalars per cOT slot; both parties get `OtWidth` shares per bit | ### Three rounds ```go import ( "crypto/rand" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/core/curves" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/ot/base/simplest" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/ot/extension/kos" "github.com/sonr-io/crypto/ot/ottest" ) func runCOt(curve *curves.Curve) error { uniqueSessionId := [simplest.DigestSize]byte{} if _, err := rand.Read(uniqueSessionId[:]); err != nil { return err } // Seed OT: exactly Kappa base OTs. baseSenderOutput, baseReceiverOutput, err := ottest.RunSimplestOT(curve, kos.Kappa, uniqueSessionId) if err != nil { return err } // Note the crossed roles. sender := kos.NewCOtSender(baseReceiverOutput, curve) receiver := kos.NewCOtReceiver(baseSenderOutput, curve) // Receiver's input: the packed choice vector. choice := [kos.COtBlockSizeBytes]byte{} if _, err = rand.Read(choice[:]); err != nil { return err } // Sender's input: the correlations alpha_j. input := [kos.L][kos.OtWidth]curves.Scalar{} for i := 0; i < kos.L; i++ { for j := 0; j < kos.OtWidth; j++ { input[i][j] = curve.Scalar.Random(rand.Reader) } } round1Output, err := receiver.Round1Initialize(uniqueSessionId, choice) if err != nil { return err } round2Output, err := sender.Round2Transfer(uniqueSessionId, input, round1Output) if err != nil { return err } if err = receiver.Round3Transfer(round2Output); err != nil { return err } // Invariant: for every slot j and every k < OtWidth, // sender.OutputAdditiveShares[j][k] + receiver.OutputAdditiveShares[j][k] // == input[j][k] if choice bit j is 1 // == 0 if choice bit j is 0 return nil } ``` Steps 1–4 of Protocol 9. The receiver extends its packed `L`-bit choice vector, derives the matrix `U` from the seed OT pads, and emits `Round1Output{U, WPrime, VPrime}` — `WPrime` and `VPrime` are the consistency-check values that make the extension maliciously secure rather than merely semi-honest. Steps 2, 5 and 6. The sender checks `WPrime`/`VPrime`, transposes and hashes the matrix, and returns `Round2Output{Tau}`. Side effect: `sender.OutputAdditiveShares` is populated. Step 7. The receiver computes its own `OutputAdditiveShares` from `Tau`. No return value beyond the error. Both parties read their result from the exported field `OutputAdditiveShares [L][OtWidth]curves.Scalar`. Streaming equivalents mirror the base layer: `SenderStreamCOtRun(sender *Sender, hashKeySeed [simplest.DigestSize]byte, input [L][OtWidth]curves.Scalar, rw io.ReadWriter) error` and `ReceiverStreamCOtRun(receiver *Receiver, hashKeySeed [simplest.DigestSize]byte, choice [COtBlockSizeBytes]byte, rw io.ReadWriter) error`. Both take the inputs plus a `ReadWriter` and handle every round and every encode/decode. ## Caveats :::danger[Never reuse a uniqueSessionId across executions] The session id is not a label. In `simplest` it is absorbed into the Merlin transcript that binds the Schnorr proof and every hash in the protocol; the package doc identifies it as *the HMAC key realizing the random oracle*. In `kos` it is passed to both `Round1Initialize` and `Round2Transfer` and keys the matrix hashing. Reusing one across two executions therefore reuses the random-oracle keying. Two runs produce related pads, the consistency-check values from one run become valid transcripts for another, and the malicious-security argument — which assumes a fresh independent oracle per session — no longer holds. Concretely, replaying a recorded round-1 message under a repeated session id is exactly the attack the transcript binding exists to stop. The rules: - 32 bytes from a CSPRNG, per execution. Both parties must hold the identical value, so derive it from *both* parties' contributions and agree on it before round 1 — that is why `dklsv1`'s `Round1GenerateRandomSeed` has each side sample 32 bytes and appends both, with the documented property "secure if either party is honest". - Never derive it from a counter, a timestamp, a key id, or anything an adversary can predict or force to repeat. - Never persist and reuse one across signatures. Each signature runs a fresh cOT extension with a fresh session id. - Do not confuse it with the *seed OT output*, which is deliberately long-lived. The seed OT result is reused for many signatures; the session id of each cOT extension is not. ::: :::warning[batchSize must be a multiple of 8] The package doc states the limitation plainly: "currently we only support batch OTs that are multiples of 8." Choice bits are packed, and both constructors reject a non-multiple with `batch size should be a multiple of 8`. `kos` always passes `Kappa` (256), which satisfies it. ::: :::warning[Every output field is key material] `SenderOutput.OneTimePadEncryptionKeys`, `ReceiverOutput.OneTimePadDecryptionKey`, and `ReceiverOutput.PackedRandomChoiceBits` / `RandomChoiceBits` are all secret. They are persisted inside `dkg.AliceOutput.SeedOtResult` and `dkg.BobOutput.SeedOtResult`, and [serialised in the clear](/threshold/threshold-ecdsa) by the `dklsv1` encoders. Encrypt them at rest. The one consolation the DKG docs note: unlike a lost `SecretKeyShare`, disclosed seed-OT material can be replaced by re-running OT — which is what [key refresh](/threshold/threshold-ecdsa) does. ::: :::warning[Not constant time] These packages do byte-level bit manipulation, binary-field multiplication, and matrix transposition over secret choice vectors, using ordinary indexing and branching. Only the `batchSize & 0x07` check carries a constant-time comment. Assume nothing here resists timing or cache analysis. ::: :::note[No audit claim, and correctness only asserted for K256/P256] This is a port of Coinbase's Kryptology. The live tests run `TestOtOnMultipleCurves`, `TestOTStreaming`, `TestCOTExtension`, `TestCOTExtensionStreaming`, and `TestBinaryMult` — the cOT tests over `curves.K256()` and `curves.P256()` only. Nothing here constitutes a security review of either package. See [Security Notes](/reference/security). ::: :::note[State is single-use] A `Sender`/`Receiver` pair, at either layer, serves exactly one protocol execution. Round methods mutate the value and are not goroutine-safe. ::: ## Next The consumer: DKG rounds 6–10 are the seed OT, and every signature runs a cOT extension. The proof of knowledge in base OT round 1. The `Curve`, `Point`, and `Scalar` types both packages are generic over. Where this layer sits in the stack.